兩岸服貿協議到底對產業的發展有何影響,立法院財政委員會議找來五個產業代表說明,四個產業代表都說好,唯獨PCHOME創辦人詹宏志說,服貿不過,可透過其他管道發展。

兩岸服貿協議通過,到底好不好,產業代表們被請上台,逐一詢問意見。

包括銀行公會理事長李紀珠、券商公會理事長簡鴻文等四位理事長口徑一致,都說利大於弊,惟獨PCHOME創辦人詹宏志認為,服貿並非唯一解藥。

[[電子商務理事長 詹宏志]]
“現在看來,即使沒有服貿,電子商務也能透過上海自貿區的條例,以外商的方式,不以台商的身分進到中國”

不過詹宏志也強調,服貿協議不通過,對長期影響較大,因為會讓目前台灣與中國「跨境交易不對等」的情況繼續擴大,讓已經落後給中國的電子商務業,雪上加霜。

In a meeting organized by the Legislature’s Finance Committee, business representatives gave generally positive marks to the services trade pact Taiwan signed with China. One representative said Taiwanese enterprises have alternative channels to compete in China now, but would eventually fall behind without the pact’s passage. 

At the conclusion of mass protests against the cross-strait trade-in-services pact, there still wasn’t a consensus on whether the pact would be good for Taiwan. Industrial representatives were called on today to give their opinions.

Four representatives, including Bankers Association Chairwoman Lee Chi-chu and Taiwan Securities Association Chairman Chien Hung-wen, said without hesitation that the pact’s benefits outweigh its disadvantages. PC Home founder Jan Hung-tze said that, for now, Taiwan has other methods of competing in China.

Jan Hung-tze
Taiwan Internet and E-Commerce Assoc.
Based on current conditions, even if the services trade pact does not pass, e-commerce enterprises can still enter China as a foreign enterprise under regulations governing the Shanghai free trade zone. They don’t have to enter China as a Taiwanese enterprise.

But Jan did say that failure to pass the services trade agreement would have a larger long-term impact. He believes Taiwan’s cross-border trade disadvantages would expand, hurting local industries that are already falling behind Chinese competitors.

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    英倫翻譯社 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()